Emory Law Journal

Volume 64Issue 4

“The Twain Shall Meet”: A Real Property Approach to Article 9 Perfection

Patrick H. Hill | 64 Emory L.J. 1103 (2015)

In an era of boundless access to information, a group of rogue citizens is waging an antigovernment war of attrition. Trading firearms for securities documents, the Sovereign Citizens are wreaking havoc on a system designed to foster justice for all. By manipulating the infirm process of securing credit, these domestic terrorists threaten to topple the American legal and economic systems. Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code facilitates the creation of security interests in personal property. The American Law Institute and the National Conference of Commissioners of Uniform State Laws on occasion revisit and amend the Uniform Commercial Code to ensure its continued effectiveness. The drafters must turn their attention to the infirmities of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. While Article 9 allows creditors to perfect their interests in personal property with ease, its prescribed methods have proven vulnerable to abuse. This Comment argues that the drafters should borrow from real property traditions to lend validity to the process of perfecting an interest in personal property.

Read More »

Combating Hindsight Reconstruction in Patent Prosecution

Ashley Allman Bolt | 64 Emory L.J. 1137 (2015)

The common saying “hindsight is 20–20” rings true in many different areas; in patent law specifically, hindsight bias has the potential to affect a patent examiner’s determination of whether an invention is “obvious” under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The examiner may permissibly rely upon a combination of prior art references to find that a claim would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art. However, the examiner may not use “that which only the inventor taught . . . against its teacher.” Structural flaws within the examination process place pressure upon examiners to reject claims upon first examination, regardless of the content of those claims. This Comment proposes a framework that focuses on the question of whether an examiner has impermissibly relied upon hindsight to combine references in determining obviousness. This framework provides an avenue for discussion between the patent examiner and the prosecuting attorney and provides substance to be considered by decisionmakers on appeal.

Read More »

In Combination: Using Hybrid Rights to Expand Religious Liberty

Ryan S. Rummage | 64 Emory L.J. 1175 (2015)

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects, among other things, the right to the free exercise of religion. In 1990, the Supreme Court held, in Employment Division v. Smith, that valid and neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause. While this decision has reduced the amount of religious liberty protection available to claimants, the decision did leave a silver lining for religious liberty claimants in the form of hybrid rights, which involve the combination of a free exercise claim with another constitutionally protected claim. Because the Supreme Court in Smith did not adequately address hybrid rights, the question remains: when can a combination of protected rights provide religious liberty to a claimant? Three different hybrid rights approaches have emerged: treating Smith as dicta, allowing independent claims, and allowing colorable claims. This Comment argues that the first two approaches completely foreclose the possibility of hybrid rights protection, while the colorable claim approach provides the proper avenue for religious claimants. Then, this Comment makes two arguments for the expansion of hybrid rights.

Read More »